We have taken down the Silent Sam Civil War monument on UNC Chapel Hill’s campus and the statues of Confederate soldiers on many courthouse plazas.

But there are other monuments to the Civil War and slavery that cannot be removed – unfortunately.

In “Scars on the Land: An Environmental History of Slavery in the American South,” David Silkenat explains how over a 200-year period slavery made possible environmental disasters that cursed and continue to curse our region.

Silkenat says the slave owners in America’s South saw their landscape as disposable.

Using intensive farming methods made possible by slavery, southern plantation owners wore out their farms. Rather than rehabilitating the land as they exploited it, they simply bought new land to replace what had been ruined.

Sometimes, the replacement land could be purchased nearby. Other times, the owners and slaves from worn-out plantations would move from North Carolina to fresh lands in Alabama or Mississippi, with the enslaved people walking all the way.

In Virginia, Thomas Jefferson noted in 1793 that he did not use manure to fertilize or replenish his worn-out tobacco fields “because we can buy an acre of new land cheaper than we can manure an old acre.”

Twenty years later Jefferson acknowledged that the intensive farming by his slaves had left his soils inert.

But the environmental damage associated with slavery was not limited to farmlands.

In North Carolina, for instance, intensive enslaved labor made possible the exploitation and destruction of the magnificent longleaf pine forests that covered our state. To secure the pitch and tar from the pine trees, enslaved labor tapped, and scratched the surface, taking the “blood” the trees needed to sustain themselves, leaving only ghosts of once-magnificent forests.

Silkenat wrote, “Intensive extraction conspired with environmental factors to expedite the forests’ destruction. Scarification caused by repeating chipping made the trees vulnerable to wood-boring insects such as the ips beetle, the turpentine bore, and the black turpentine beetle. Stripped of their bark, the pine trees stood defenseless against these insects. A turpentine-borer epidemic in 1848-1849 along the Cape Fear River devastated the heart of North Carolina’s longleaf pine.”

Also, in North Carolina, the use of enslaved labor during the gold rush days before the Civil War made possible the extraction of gold but left a ruined landscape behind.

In South Carolina, the rice plantations that made that state wealthy before the Civil War, required an enormous commitment of enslaved labor to dig and manage the canals and other waterways that provided the right conditions for the crop. Those canals and their upkeep, adjustment, and repairs destroyed the natural environment and left the coastal lands permanently affected.

Similarly, along the Mississippi River, the construction of levees to protect farmlands from flooding required enslaved labor. Continuing maintenance and repair demanded a long-term commitment of enslaved labor. The adjustments to the normal ebb and flow of the river still make for the continuing disruption of the great river’s natural flow.

In cotton and tobacco fields, hardwood and pine forests, rice fields, goldmines, rivers, and levees, slavery brought about even more damage to the environment. Although the author sets out many more examples of damage, he acknowledges that “the environmental devastation chronicled in this book pales in comparison to the brutality of American slavery on human bodies and souls. Yet looking at slavery through an environmental lens reveals how the chattel principle poisoned everything it touched.”

The book’s author, David Silkenat, a senior lecturer in American history at the University of Edinburgh, has strong North Carolina connections. His wife’s parents live in Chapel Hill. His father-in-law, Willis Whichard, was a North Carolina Supreme Court justice and dean of Campbell University’s law school. Whichard himself is the author of an important new book, “A Consequential Life: David Lowry Swain, Nineteenth-Century North Carolina, and Their University.”

D.G. Martin, a lawyer, served as UNC-System’s vice president for Public Affairs and hosted PBS-NC’s North Carolina Bookwatch.

(5) comments

David Collins

That was an uplifting tale indeed .

The blacks that other blacks sold into bondage were victims of their times . Has much really changed since then ? Talking on a world wide view here . A little looking would indicate that things have not . Tearing down every statue/monument changes nothing , other than increased ignorance of history .


Immature folks like Mr. Martin should recognize that history will always be here no matter how many confederate statues you remove. History makes us wiser.

Woke-washing and White-washing history is ignorance. I guess we now live in a world where it's okay to destroy anything you disagree with.

Mr. Martin: grow up and move on.


Killing the messenger remains popular as ever. Woke washing? I am not sure exactly what that means, other then i disagree and will label it " woke" to attempt to discredit it. As I remember my history it is true that in many cases black slaves were sold by their black captors. however it was the dutch who started the african slave trade, and that is what created the demand and opportunity for african tribal warriors to capture and sell their rivals, in far larger numbers then would have otherwise been the case. I don't really see the connection between slavery and ecological destruction, humans excell at ecological destruction slaves or not. The dust bowl era had no slaves working the land, yet by tilling under native grasses, with the help of newfangled machines they managed to destroy their own environment within 2 generations.


This is quite possibly the most idiotic commentary I’ve read in some time.

Obviously, this lawyer is just a UNC PR guy, a self-absorbed whiner.

He just wants to continually stir the pot by scraping the bottom of the barrel.

David Collins

Ouch ! Shame on you Drew for scuttling the author’s narrative . Guess Chapel Hill is not quite the bastion of all knowledge they make themselves out to be . Whodathunk !

Welcome to the discussion.

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive/condescending attacks on other users or goading them. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning.