Morehead City, N.C.

May 7, 2021


With respect to the controversial Starling / Osteen rezoning proposal for the parcel on Highway 24 at the entrance to Spooner’s Creek, two versions of a “Consistency Statement” and “Reasonableness Assessment” were submitted to the council for its workshop earlier in the week.

The town council must issue a Consistency Statement when a rezoning request is made that assesses the proposal’s consistency with the town’s Land Use Plan. The town council must also issue a Statement of Reasonableness when accepting or rejecting a zoning amendment.

This Statement of Reasonableness may consider, among other factors, (i) the size, physical conditions, and other attributes of the area proposed to be rezoned, (ii) the benefits and detriments to landowners, the neighbors, and the surrounding community, (iii) the relationship between the current actual and permissible development on the tract and adjoining areas and the development that would be permissible under the proposed development; (iv) why the action taken is in the public interest; and (v) any changed conditions warranting the amendment.

In the draft version accepting the Starling / Osteen rezoning request – a request that has several inconsistencies with the Land Use Plan – the council concludes that “…[t]he area adjoining the proposed development area on the north side of Highway 24 has significant commercial development and some areas within Neighborhood 9 include churches and other allowed but non-residential uses. These changes in conditions, the need to promote medium density multifamily development for independent living facilities for senior citizens, need to increase availability for commercial development in this transitioning area support amendment of the Land Use Plan, the zoning map, and the zoning classifications: to accommodate the proposed development plan to meet the needs of the community…..It is reasonable and in the public interest to make changes to the town's zoning map and Land Use Plan in order to promote expansion of space for reasonably low impact retail and commercial development within in the Highway 24 corridor and to support alternative housing options for senior citizens within our community.”

The staff drafting these documents may have relied on the brevity of the examples provided in the regulations, but these were examples for situations where the rezoning was consistent with the existing Land Use Plan.

In view of the level of opposition to this rezoning proposal, as expressed by constituents in numerous letters to the council and planning board, letters to this newspaper, signs voicing opposition placed all around town, and a petition signed by more than 500 people, the analysis is wholly inadequate.

For example, traffic safety is not even mentioned in the version approving the rezoning, and the environmental concerns raised have not been adequately addressed. A thorough “reasonableness analysis” would address the conditions that have changed that would compel the council to deviate from the zoning as set out in the existing Land Use Plan, particularly when constituents have highlighted the glut of available commercial property in the area.

Finally, it is not clear why Spooner’s Creek has been labeled in these documents as a “transitioning area.” Because of the interest in this issue, if the council approves the proposed rezoning, it is incumbent upon the members to better articulate how the rezoning change meet the needs of the community, and why the actions are reasonable and in the public interest.


(7) comments


Lotta dancing there with the point being they did what you wrote, its just not the outcome you wanted, so by pointing out some things , your hoping they will not go forward. Um, its been my experience , ALL of these councils act in the best interest of their TRUE masters. Geez, these people give buying LAND a bad name. (all this interference, with garbage) I do have a question, WHO OWNS THE LAND CURRENTLY? Thx in advance.

the secret life of man

Carteret news times is spam


Why read and comment then bud?


Still spam Metastatic bias.


Got that right


Thr Green New Deal will be disguised as permuting and zoning. This will avoid the tedious lawmaking process. . The oysters are an obvious target, and we will just have to make it on their own. Be careful what you wish for


Great letter, valid points. I especially like " invested in r 20 neighboorhood".

The powers that be will not be happy till it is concrete and strip malls from havelock to surf city. I was at the cornor of the stella rd and Belgrade Swansboro rd fri at 4 pm trying to make a left turn. It was a full 7 mins before there was a break in traffic.

Even 5 yrs ago there was no where near that volume of traffic.

Daniel Boones father supposedly said " "when you can see the smoke from your neighbors chimney, it's time to move"

Anyone care to bet the zoning gets changed to accommodate " progress"?

Welcome to the discussion.

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive/condescending attacks on other users or goading them. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning.