The Carteret County Board of Education should reverse course on its recent decision to begin the process of shuttering the Marine Science and Technology Early College High School (MaST) located on the Carteret Community College campus. The county schools should reinstate freshmen enrollment to keep the program alive. Otherwise this decision could be costly in both student/parent participation and in financial support.

 As school systems across the state respond to pandemic fears and Governor Cooper’s mandate restricting school operations parents are now opting for either virtual classroom participation or alternatives such as homeschooling and private schools. The result is reduced enrollment in the county schools and a subsequent reduction in future support of the public school system.

Cheryl Burke’s front page story in today’s News-Times notes that a growing number of local parents, frustrated by the constant changes in the educational system due to concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, are looking for and finding alternative educational services such as private schools and home schools. Last school year 2019-20, prior to the pandemic, the N.C. Division of Non-Public Education (the state department overseeing home schools) showed there were 1,032 home schools registered in the county, representing 1,456 students. Figures for the 2020-21 school year are not available but representatives of North Carolinians for Home Educators note that registration is up significantly as are applications at local private schools.

These alternatives, along with a lawsuit filed last week to stop the closure of MaST by the board of education, is an indication that there is a growing frustration with the lack of innovation in the school system. These two events can also injure the school system’s pending $42 million bond referendum due for consideration in the November election.

In June the county’s school board voted 6-1 to discontinue MaST, which is part of the state’s Cooperative Innovative High School program that matches high schools with either public or private colleges, with the expressed purpose of promoting interest in both higher education and advanced technical degrees. The decision to begin shuttering the school after only one year in operation was based on fears that the state funding for the program is short lived and that the county will have to pick up the additional $200,000 in expenses to support the program.

In addition to the funding challenges for MaST, several school board members expressed fears that the program will reduce attendance at the county’s three high schools, thereby reducing funding based on Average Daily Membership (ADM). One school board member, Travis Day, has complained that the program, limited to only 200 students, creates a special group. That argument totally ignores the other programs in place providing special services designated for academically gifted students that is likewise limited in participation.

Regardless of the complaints, the pandemic is forcing major changes in how education is being delivered. These changes have all the indications of being permanent and have opened the eyes of parents about educational alternatives. County school board members and the school administrators should not consider these changes as temporary and that once the pandemic is past, schooling will revert to historic operations. That hubristic thinking will only facilitate distrust in the system.

MaST is part of the Cooperative Innovative High School (CIHS) program which has proven to be very successful statewide. There are 131 such programs, MaST being one of most recent additions, spread out in 97 of the 115 state school districts. Guilford county has 11 early college programs and nearby Craven county has two. A recent article by early childhood reporter Liz Bell noted that in the 2017-18 school year, CIHS students outperformed their peers in a variety of metrics including retention and completion rates and individual assessment. In the process the program facilitates technical professions through the community college system and college credits for students seeking four-year college degree.

There is no question that Carteret County Schools are successful. The school system has consistently ranked in the top 10 in the state with several local schools being ranked among the best nationally by US News. But parents and students want more choices and the current situation is opening the door to the options heretofore not fully understood.

While the school board is concerned about the financial resources for the future funding of MaST, that may be a moot concern as parents, frustrated by the lack of innovative opportunities which they are now seeking, decide that the public schools are not providing the education they’re now experiencing with alternatives.

If the school board will continue this popular and very successful program they will infuse faith in the system and subsequently gain support for the proposed $42 million school bond referendum.

(7) comments

Carteret Native 01

Finally, an editorial with which I can agree!

Carteret Native 01

Congratulations to the News-Times for coming down on the right side of this argument. Carteret County Schools need forward-thinking leaders who can bring the innovation needed to prepare our students for the daunting times they will face as adults. Experts agree that there will be fewer good-paying jobs and more competition to get them. Automation and artificial intelligence will replace more workers than ever before.

At, our District 4 Board of Education member states: "Although MaST had been touted as a “trade school” targeting at risk or “first generation” students, it was only after pressure from some members of the BOE and County Commissioners that MaST revised the types of students it was attempting to attract and admit. Many students applied to MaST based on the lure of "free college credits." MaST application data revealed that 86.5% of 2019-2020 MaST applicants and 81% of 2019-2020 applicants were interested in transitioning from MaST directly to a 4-year college." Clearly Day sees students with college ambitions as a threat to our system. He obviously prefers to see our students educated for trade jobs at which they might earn $15.00 hour in Carteret County, if the trade jobs even exist here. Meanwhile in his biography Day brags of a bachelor degree and MBA from the University of North Carolina and a job with the UNC system. A UNC web site ( states that, as of June 30, 2020, Day earns $91,341.00 per year at UNC. A $15.00 per hour tradesman earns $31,200.00 per year, and with a family of four, would qualify for food stamps. Which of your daughters, Mr. Day, are being groomed for a trade school education?

Granted, a few positions in a few trades at a few locations, do pay more than $15.00 per hour. A welder on the construction of a nuclear plant might be paid handsomely. But, those jobs are no longer available. A welder repairing busted boat trailers will be lucky to get $15.00 per hour. And robots weld.

Politicians are lowering our ambitions and expectations in stating that there are lots great paying trades jobs. Think about it. Can you tell me where those jobs are?

Travis Day would not have his good job without a college education. Our kids will not have good jobs without a college degree and in most cases advanced degrees. We should be doing everything in our power, including MaST, to make advanced education possible. To do less is to condemn our children to futures that are less bright than our own.



So true! How well paying are all the tourism related jobs that are going to "help" our county? Do they pay enough for someone to live w/o having to depend on social services? Or is the county counting on social services to make up the lack of income for all of those low paying jobs?


But there are more important funding priorities for our County...... wonder who owes who a favor for that $60k payment...."wheeling" and dealin'


Shouldnt there be a disclaimer in there somewhere that the editor has grandkids that went to that school? Not exactly an unbiased take there.


How does that matter when this was a letter TO the editor, not FROM the editor? It’s the submitter’s opinion... What would be the purpose of a disclaimer?

Maybe a disclaimer should be put out along with how closely related board members are with each contract awarded, for instance, Chadwick and the tires for the county busses. That concerns me more than the editor printing the opinion of someone else in an opinion section...


It will be difficult to promote any agenda and hold reasonable discussion on school matters in Carteret County as long as the Board of Education and Board of Commissioners are so closely tied (related).

Welcome to the discussion.

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive/condescending attacks on other users or goading them. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning.