Emerald Isle concurs with decision to reject federal beach nourishment plan

Emerald Isle commissioners voted Tuesday night to stay with Carteret County’s current master plan for nourishing beaches, like this one in town. (Brad Rich photo)

EMERALD ISLE — Town commissioners voted 5-0 Tuesday night to concur with the Carteret County Beach Commission’s recommendation to not opt into a federal beach nourishment program for Bogue Banks.

The vote came during the Emerald Isle Board of Commissioners’ monthly meeting, conducted on GoToMeeting.

Commissioner Jim Normile, who is vice chairperson of the beach panel, made the motion. The beach commission advises Greg Rudolph, manager of the County Shore Protection Office, which plans and oversees beach nourishment projects.

Mr. Rudolph said during the meeting that although the beach panel feels it’s right to stay with the local plan that relies on occupancy tax revenue, state funds and money from the Federal Emergency Management Agency to fund projects, he was making the rounds to make sure the affected towns agreed.

The Atlantic Beach Town Council voted on the issue Monday and also concurred. Indian Beach hasn’t voted.

The federal plan, which the county has been working on for more than two decades, was finally approved and partly funded last year by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It’s called the Coastal Storm Risk Management Project and generally would fund 65% federal money to augment 35% local funds for an initial nourishment project, as well as at least 50% of the cost of future “maintenance” nourishment when measured erosion triggers show projects are warranted. The current county plan relies on similar triggers.

But Mr. Normile and Mr. Rudolph have noted the federal plan relies on annual federal budget allocations to the ACE, which would also design and supervise nourishment projects, ending local control. The plan would also eliminate use of FEMA money for efforts.

In addition, Mr. Rudolph said Tuesday, the federal plan would impose tougher public beach parking space requirements on the island at a time when available property is very expensive and hard to find. It would require 133 more parking spaces in Emerald Isle, Mr. Rudolph said, in addition to the more than 300 already available in the two major accesses.

Mr. Rudolph also noted the federal plan would require the county and towns to obtain countless oceanfront easements, at a cost that could exceed $2 million.

“After a year of discussion … the beach commission recommended not entering into the federal agreement,” Mr. Rudolph told the Emerald Isle board. “But this is not a done deal.”

Mr. Normile said the ACE’s $44 million in funding awarded last year for the federal plan was “a pleasant surprise” and praised Mr. Rudolph and others for making it happen. However, he noted it was potentially hazardous to do anything that would eliminate the use of FEMA money, which has helped fund two major nourishment projects since Hurricane Florence hit in September 2018. FEMA money also is helping to pay for a third project, set to begin this month in Emerald Isle.

There was no debate on the motion by Mr. Normile to “stay the course” on beach nourishment.

The county spent $1.6 million to study the feasibility of the federal plan and another $350,000 on engineering and design. The federal government spent $2 million on the feasibility study and $1.3 million on engineering and design. The state has kicked in $1.29 million on the feasibility study and $350,000 for engineering and design.

The county will lose the ACE’s $44.5 million contribution if it formally opts out of the federal plan.


Contact Brad Rich at 252-864-1532; email Brad@thenewstimes.com; or follow on Twitter @brichccnt.

(9) comments


I would support this decision. Keep the camel's nose outside the tent.

David Collins

Thought FEMA emergency money was for emergencies . This is not an emergency , it is a WANT . That needs to change . More taxpayer fraud ?


Agreed, this is just a ploy to keep EI from letting the general public access to our beach. EI wishes to use FEMA cash to protect the shoreline for an exclusive few. If you do the math 10 dollars per parking spot at 300 parking spots per day is $3,000.00 per day. Now times that 365 days per year is $1,095,000 per year. EI wants to go up on their parking to say $20 per space. So the land owners want the visitors to foot the bill so as the land owners want a private beach. Not to mention the interest collected on said parking income. Is this the massage that EI wants to send out?




How does the county have 1.6 million to spend on a study and yet they say they don't have $$ for lifeguards unless they charge for parking more????


1.6 million dollars to study this & no money for lifeguards?


Emerald Isle Board has done a great job in preserving our town and beaches. Smart move in keeping the Federal Government out of our town.


Then why do they need 1.6 million to study this?

David Collins

You have to pay to play , Miami . The power of taxation and fees , a tax by a different name , a kinder and gentler name but does the same thing . Still money out of your pocket .

Welcome to the discussion.

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive/condescending attacks on other users or goading them. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning.