Without referendum, towns must keep funding dredging

A dredge works in the waters off the coast of Carteret County in this file photo. (News-Times photo)

BOGUE BANKS — A referendum for a quarter-cent hike in local sales and use taxes failed again Nov. 3, meaning local governments still have to chip in on dredging projects.

This year’s General Election ballot included a question on whether or not Carteret County voters support a local quarter-cent sales tax increase. While state statute doesn’t allow the County Board of Commissioners to obligate how tax revenue will be used, commissioners have said in previous public statements they wished to use the additional revenue for paying off public school debts and waterway management, the latter of which includes dredging and other maintenance.

In Carteret County, two of the largest inlets are Bogue Inlet on the west end of Bogue Banks and Beaufort Inlet on the east end. In Atlantic Beach, on the east end of Bogue Banks, Mayor Trace Cooper told the News-Times Monday he was in favor of the referendum.

“It would have allowed visitors and tourists to shoulder some of the cost of our county’s government activities, including waterway maintenance,” he said. “For each of the past several years, the town has funded our own inland waterway maintenance by dredging the channels that lead from Atlantic Beach to the ICW (Intracoastal Waterway). We dedicate a portion of our property tax to this endeavor each year.”

Mayor Cooper said state grants supplement the town’s annual dredging funds.

While the referendum failure means there won’t be any county funds for dredging, Mayor Cooper didn’t seem worried about the continued maintenance of the town’s channels.

“We will continue to maintain our channels with the same combination of Atlantic Beach property tax and state grants,” he said. “The benefit of the referendum is that we could have replaced the local tax dollars currently being paid by Atlantic Beach property owners with sales tax, the majority of which is paid by visitors.”

Mayor Cooper said he’d support putting the referendum on the ballot again in the next election. If it passes, he said, it could mean slightly lower property tax rates for Atlantic Beach taxpayers.

On the west end of Bogue Banks, Emerald Isle Town Manager Matt Zapp said in an email Monday to the News-Times his town’s officials handle local dredging in a similar way to Atlantic Beach — a combination of local and state funding.

“For public projects, the state has (a) 2/3 reimbursable grant program via the Shallow Draft Navigation Channel Dredging and Aquatic Weed Fund,” Mr. Zapp said, “which includes an application/award process. The Shallow Draft Fund is endowed by a portion of boater registration fees and 1% of the marine gas tax collected throughout the state.”

The remaining costs are the responsibility of a given local government. Mr. Zapp said Emerald Isle officials pay their share via the town’s general fund.

“If the sales tax referendum passed, then there would be a reserve fund established at the county, which would be distributed to the towns or used by the county to pay the 1/3 local government match,” he said. “In theory, this step would have alleviated some of the burden on our property tax, as proceeds from a sales tax are created by visitors and residents alike throughout the town and county.”

Mr. Zapp said approval of a referendum could save Emerald Isle officials “tens of thousands per year.”

For all the towns in the county, it could have saved hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, according to Greg Rudolph, head of the county’s Shore Protection Office, which oversees dredging and beach nourishment projects.

Beaufort Mayor Rett Newton said in an email Tuesday to the News-Times the waterways around Beaufort have been an important part of the town since its inception “and will continue to be with property dredging.”

“Currently, the town contributes to a state Shallow Draft Dredging (grant) that allows us to leverage 1/3 of the cost for dredging Bulkhead Channel with 2/3 state funds,” he said. “On average, the total cost of dredging Bulkhead Channel is around $180,000 - $240,000 a year, with the town’s contribution being between $60,000 and $80,000.”

Mayor Newton said county officials have contributed to Beaufort’s dredging expenses on occasion, but not every year.

 

Contact Mike Shutak at 252-723-7353, email mike@thenewstimes.com; or follow on Twitter at @mikesccnt.

(4) comments

David Collins

It always seems to come back to school debt . A targeted fee on public school use by non property owner ‘ residents could be looked at . Certain income requirements could lessen the impact on the income challenged but all the users need to step up to some degree .

Dredging , well an increase in the occupancy tax would trim some of the burden there . A ramp usage fee , stickers on trailers and kayaks would help as well . The water users need the dredging so let them foot some of the cost . Just a few ideas that could be explored but something fair needs to be done . There is no free lunch .

Herewegoagain

Read the article if this link and tell me that it is the school?!?! The county is paying to dredge Hyde county because it is the “neighborly thing to do” get out of here. Still the same corrupt politicians lying about the money and how it is spent! https://www.carolinacoastonline.com/news_times/article_05af01ea-22af-11eb-80a5-279859efaa31.html

This is quoted from the audit report...

“As for the audit report, it shows the school system ended fiscal 2019-20 with $3.5 million in its general fund balance. Of that amount, $1.96 million is available for the remainder of the 2019-20 school year. The rest is obligated to outstanding costs or is restricted.“

David Collins

2nd paragraph , 2nd paragraph . Other than that , nowhere .

Kfergus999

asking the majority of county residents to pay for what benefits the few is unreasonable, and i think irresponsible of an elected official. I have no suggestion for an equitable source of funds.

Welcome to the discussion.

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive/condescending attacks on other users or goading them. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning.