Emerald Isle, N.C.

Nov. 9, 2019

TO THE EDITOR:

In response to Sunday’s letter from John Droz Jr., I understand his issue with citing political partisanship as the cause for problems within the Board of Education (BOE). Truthfully, it’s very much a local problem that can’t be blamed on any one political party or ideology. What it does stem from is a desire by a few elected leaders in our county to control all aspects or our local government.

When you have our current county commissioners quoted in the newspaper about their success in recruiting candidates for the BOE that indicates a problem. The BOE should be independent from the county commissioners to make decisions based solely on the needs of our students and staff within the Carteret County School System.

Now it just so happens that our commissioners are all Republican and at a recent GOP meeting it was mentioned that they already had $5K ready to back someone who would toe the line. Does this feel like a political agenda of sorts? Seems like that would have a person in the seat who would be beholden to a benefactor and their agendas. Just as we need to have a balance of power at the federal level, we must ensure that the same is true for our state and local governments.

In all transparency, I am currently running for the District 4 seat on the BOE as a Republican. But I was not recruited by the party; I signed up out of concern for our schools and students. I have four boys ranging in age from 7-15. I am able to see the issues facing our administrators, teachers and school staff on a daily basis. It can be easy to take the 10,000-foot view of our schools and think high test scores mean ultimate success, but our schools, teachers, and students are so much more than a EOG test score.

Luckily we had a wonderful superintendent with Mat Bottoms, who was able to recruit and retain an amazing team of school administrators who in turn were able to attract the best teachers in the state. Our BOE can’t take credit for our ranking in N.C. This belongs to our teachers and administrators who, day in and day out, pour everything they have into our children. These are the same people who don’t feel comfortable speaking out to the BOE as they know dissension can mean loss of a job. How is that healthy for our county? How is having our extremely successful superintendent “retire” when we know he isn’t done? The people who are responsible for our successful schools are not being valued while those who have no hand in the success are taking all of the accolades.

So yes, this isn’t really about political party. It’s about some people leveraging their place within a political party to control others. It’s forgetting that we need a mix of opinions to allow debate, which in turn helps us find truth. Debate causes us to think analytically, mindful of facts and emotions, on both sides of the issue. This allows participants to engage in an exchange of ideas with the goal being a fusion of ideas which represents the best contributions of ALL participants. Otherwise, we just have rhetoric.

We want the county commissioners to have an opinion — they are there to focus on the very difficult job of a countywide budget. But we want a BOE to be focused on students and to advocate for our schools. Together, with various opinions we can reach a synthesis of ideas that represents our best options. This is NOT what we currently have, which is a BOE controlled by the commissioners, which means no debate and no mix of opinions.

So if you’ve hung in with me long enough to read this lengthy letter, I ask that you examine what is happening in our county. Who is “appointing” whom in our leadership positions and what are their connections? Please don’t turn a blind eye to what is happening and vote March 3rd. We can turn this around; it’s not too late.

ANDREA PHILLIPS BEASLEY

(7) comments

Osprey

County Commissioners and the BOE school budget have been a major factor of the County School System ratings. Much more than anyone at Safrit Dr. Bottoms might be a nice guy but he has been an ineffective administrator just like his predecessor. Look at the MaST fiasco last summer. A superintendent with a spine would have not allowed the situation fester to what it became.

Clark Johnson

Great letter, Andrea! 39 years of dedication to the students of Carteret County - not spineless. 12 years leading one of the best high schools in the state - not spineless. 9 years in administration in one of the best school districts in the state - not spineless. Lobbing baseless, negative comments towards Mr. Bottoms and our school administration under an anonymous screen name - spineless.

dc

Do you think superintendents & other administrators worry about test scores, bragging rights, feathers in their hats, pay, etc.? Do you think smaller class sizes affect those test scores that they "don't" (sure) make their #1 priority? Most serious teachers and many parents and students feel the test score heat like it or not. Funding smaller class sizes to accommodate higher test scores comes from where? Public education in most non-union environments is all about test scores and many other supposedly data driven demands from on high. Closing those pesty gaps is not a worry either right? Union-controlled areas probably are much less concerned about test scores & it shows. Their far left agenda is their #1 priority & they are more than willing to spread the "love" to conservative areas. Test scores may not be the best measure of a school system but unless you want some of that union "love" you're kind of stuck with it unless and until public education takes a different road and that's not promising,

Osprey

Credentials stated Clark only shows conformity not strong leadership.

...

(Edited by staff.)

dc

By what measure do we conclude that CC is one of the best systems in the state? Does it have anything to do with test scores?

dc

Let's stay grounded. Two top reasons teachers go into administration is pay and to get out of the classroom not necessarily but probably in that order. Somebody has to do the job and can you blame them,? Whatever their position in the "system" educators in a small and somewhat conservative area like CC have it good compared to other systems in this or any other state. Superintendents and other administrators are smart to surround themselves when & if possible with smart, loyal, and hardworking subordinates. Many teachers and other subordinates are "married" to their jobs, burning midnight & weekend oil. The most dedicated and hardest workers don't know how to say "no" to their superiors & take on more and more responsibilities taking the job so serious as to many times neglect their own and their families' needs & well-being. This can apply to the administrators as well but they also get the credit & the pay commensurate with the sacrifices. It should be on administrators to "even the workload" for all their subordinates. Probably the only solution is merit pay which has its issues too. Superintendents, principals, and all administrators looking good owe most of it to their most loyal, dedicated and hard working subordinates.

David Collins

Well stated dc. It is and always has been the prime directive for the worker bees to make their boss look good. You never know, a boss someday you might become.

Welcome to the discussion.

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive/condescending attacks on other users or goading them. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning.